Chef puppet windows

So, there is an inevitable need for the comparison of various configuration tools to identify the best tool for the success of DevOps projects. At this very juncture, we bring you the comparison of the top configuration tools including Chef, Puppet and Ansible.

The three configuration tools are simple to use and yet facilitate robust capabilities to automate complex multi-tier IT application environments.

The availability of the three configuration tools in the event of main master or server failure is very high. Every tool has the facility of a backup server or an alternative master to render support in case of main server failure. Configuration language plays a prominent role in determining the applications of a configuration management tool.

Chef and Puppet follow master-agent or master-slave architecture. The management of the DevOps tools depends upon the language and configuration of the tools.

Pull configuration involves pulling all configurations from a central server to the slave nodes without any commands. Whereas, in a push configuration, all the configurations in the server will be pushed to the nodes with specific commands. Chef supports Linux and Microsoft Windows.

The languages used in Chef are Ruby and Erlang. A puppet was developed by Puppet labs created by Luke Kanies in Puppet is used for long time deployments. The documentation of Puppet is good and can be used on many platforms. Puppet is fast in configuration management. It defines the software and configuration requirements of a system. Puppet and Chef mainly focus on the configuration with minor differences between both. This is a guide to Chef vs Puppet. Here we discuss the key differences with infographics and a comparison table of Chef vs Puppet.

You can also go through our other related articles to learn more —. Submit Next Question. By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Forgot Password? This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.

By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy. Chef vs Puppet By Priya Pedamkar. Course Price View Course.

Free Data Science Course. Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you. Email ID. To create and manage Azure virtual machines VMs in a consistent manner at scale, some form of automation is typically desired. There are many tools and solutions that allow you to automate the complete Azure infrastructure deployment and management lifecycle.

This article introduces some of the infrastructure automation tools that you can use in Azure. These tools commonly fit in to one of the following approaches:. Ansible is an automation engine for configuration management, VM creation, or application deployment.

Ansible uses an agent-less model, typically with SSH keys, to authenticate and manage target machines. Configuration tasks are defined in playbooks, with a number of Ansible modules available to carry out specific tasks. For more information, see How Ansible works. Chef is an automation platform that helps define how your infrastructure is configured, deployed, and managed. Additional components included Chef Habitat for application lifecycle automation rather than the infrastructure, and Chef InSpec that helps automate compliance with security and policy requirements.

Chef Clients are installed on target machines, with one or more central Chef Servers that store and manage the configurations. For more information, see An Overview of Chef. Puppet is an enterprise-ready automation platform that handles the application delivery and deployment process. Agents are installed on target machines to allow Puppet Master to run manifests that define the desired configuration of the Azure infrastructure and VMs. Puppet can integrate with other solutions such as Jenkins and GitHub for an improved devops workflow.

For more information, see How Puppet works. Cloud-init is a widely used approach to customize a Linux VM as it boots for the first time. You can use cloud-init to install packages and write files, or to configure users and security. Because cloud-init is called during the initial boot process, there are no additional steps or required agents to apply your configuration.

For more information on how to properly format your cloud-config files, see the cloud-init documentation site. Cloud-init also works across distributions. For example, you don't use apt-get install or yum install to install a package. Instead you can define a list of packages to install.